health reform legislation if language strictly prohibiting any federal funding
of abortion is not included.
Rep. Bart Stupak of Michigan, who sponsored an amendment in
the House bill that prevents government funding for abortion, said he supports
health care reform but not the Senate-passed bill.
“If you go to page 2,069 through page 2,078, you would
find in there the federal government would directly subsidize abortions,”
Stupak told Good Morning America Thursday. “We’re not going to vote for
this bill with that kind of language in there.”
He said 11 other Democrats who supported the House bill also
would oppose the Senate version of the bill if no changes are made.
“I mean let’s face it, I want to see health care,” Stupak
said. “But we’re not going to bypass some principles and beliefs that we feel
strongly about.”
Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said
the Senate bill does not amend the government’s current policy against public
funding for abortion.
“I hope that when the bill is in its final from and people
have a chance to look at it, I think they’ll understand that this bill does not
change the status quo on abortion,” she told Good Morning America. “They
will realize that there will be no federal funding for abortion. That’s what
the president has pledged all along. This is not about an abortion debate. It’s
about health reform.”
On Wednesday, President Obama called on Congress to pass
health reform legislation, nudging them to use a process called reconciliation,
which bypasses the Senate rule that requires 60 votes to end debate. Instead,
reconciliation requires only a majority vote.
On Thursday, the White House gave Congress a March 18
deadline to pass a final health reform bill. That gives lawmakers two weeks to
pass a version of the Senate bill in the House, then a second bill that would
include any adjustments made in both chambers.
