The city of Baltimore is trying to enact a law forcing pro-life pregnancy
centers to post signs stating they do not offer abortions or
birth control referrals, which would no doubt deter some women from
seeking these centers out for help.
The Alliance Defense Fund and the Jubilee Campaign’s Law of Life
Project filed a friend-of-the-court brief with the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the 4th Circuit on behalf of three pro-life medical
associations. The American Center for Law and Justice has also filed a lawsuit challenging a similar New York City ordinance.
“Pregnancy centers, which offer real help and hope to women,
shouldn’t be punished by political allies of the abortion
industry,” ADF Legal Counsel Matt Bowman says. “As the district
court ruled, the government cannot create special speech rules for
people who want to talk about pregnancy choices. And it also cannot
target pro-life centers for special sign requirements and fines while
leaving speech by abortion clinics unregulated.”
“This measure is
troubling because it violates crisis pregnancy centers’ First and
Fourteenth Amendment rights, specifically protected by the constitution,” CeCe Heil, American Center for Law and Justice senior counsel, told Reuters regarding the case in New York. “We are committed to protecting the rights of our clients and are
urging the federal court to halt implementation of this ordinance and
declare it unconstitutional. Similar ordinances have already been
struck down in federal court and we have no doubt that this ordinance
will be rejected as well.”
The
Greater Baltimore Center for Pregnancy Concerns won its case against
the city of Baltimore when a federal court struck it down in
January, but the city is now appealing the decision. The ordinance,
enacted in late 2009, would slap the center with a $150 fine per day
it failed to issue certain disclaimers. The city places
no sign requirements on Planned Parenthood and other abortion
facilities regarding services they do not offer.
Pro-choice
advocates in California are moving to enact a law in San Francisco
that would require pregnancy centers to post whether they are
antiabortion facilities that do not offer “comprehensive health
care.”
“The
public needs to know that these legislative attacks against pregnancy
centers are focused on urban areas, the very areas where abortion
providers are prevalent, support for abortion alternatives is
lacking and abortion rates are skyrocketing,” Care Net President
Melinda Delahoyde said. “Truly, we wouldn’t be seeing all this
activity by abortion advocates if pregnancy centers weren’t making a
difference in helping women choose alternatives to abortion.”
The ACLJ and CareNet also each filed a friend-of-the-court, in support of Greater Baltimore Center for Pregnancy Concerns, Inc.
According to its website, Care Net and their “network of more than 1,100 pregnancy centers
offer hope to women facing unplanned pregnancies by providing practical
help and emotional support.”
