Fri. Aug 1st, 2025

Why Did Chief Justice Roberts Side With Liberals in Obamacare Ruling?

Chief Justice Roberts

In a shocking move, U.S. Supreme Chief Justice John Roberts joined Clinton and Obama appointees in upholding Obamacare’s individual mandate to purchase health insurance.

Writing for the majority, Roberts held that the penalty for not complying with the mandate would survive under Congress’ taxing power.

The decision is cause for grave concern for those in the pro-life movement who have, for decades, been advocating for a strategy of electing conservative presidents and relying on their Supreme Court appointees to hold to a textual constitutional interpretation, overturn Roe v. Wade, and return the authority to protect the preborn to the states.

“Enough is enough. Placing all of our hopes in judicial appointees has proven to be a disaster. It is time to have an honest conversation about where we go from here,” said Gualberto Garcia Jones, J.D., legal analyst for Personhood USA.

“The movement must unite behind personhood because [Thursday’s] decision demonstrates clearly that judges cannot be trusted to protect our rights. Ending abortion will require us to demand equality for every human being and assert the power of the people to initiate life-affirming social progress.”

President George H.W. Bush appointed Roberts in 2005 following the death of Chief Justice William Rehnquist. Thursday’s Obamacare ruling is the second major decision this week in which the Chief Justice has sided with the liberal wing of the High Court. On Monday, the Court ruled to strike a majority of provisions in the controversial Arizona immigration law.

Roberts’ first opportunity to rule on an abortion case came in 2007’s Gonzalez vs. Carhart. The Chief Justice joined the majority in upholding the federal partial birth abortion ban under the 1992 Planned Parenthood vs. Casey pro-abortion precedent, but did not concur with Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas that Casey and Roe should be overturned.

President Ronald Reagan, who many consider to be the first pro-life president in history, appointed Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and Justice Anthony Kennedy—two members of the “centrist coalition” in Casey. The third member contributing to current abortion jurisprudence by joining in that opinion was Justice David Souter, a Bush appointee. In fact, eight of the nine sitting justices on the case were Republican appointees.

By

Leave a Reply

By submitting your comment, you agree to receive occasional emails from [email protected], and its authors, including insights, exclusive content, and special offers. You can unsubscribe at any time. (U.S. residents only.)

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Podcasts

More News
The Lord’s Prayer and Cultural Change
The Lord’s Prayer and Cultural Change
I Found God In My Children’s Eyes
I Found God In My Children’s Eyes
5 Sins That Open the Door to Demons, and How to Shut Them for Good
5 Sins That Open the Door to Demons, and How to Shut Them for Good
5 Signs You’re Falling Into End-Times Deception and Don’t Even Know It
5 Signs You’re Falling Into End-Times Deception and Don’t Even Know It
Why Grace Is the Most Underrated Weapon in the Christian Life
Why Grace Is the Most Underrated Weapon in the Christian Life
Warning to the Church: Gossip is Quenching the Fire of the Holy Spirit
Warning to the Church: Gossip is Quenching the Fire of the Holy Spirit
Perry Stone Reveals Hidden Battles Ministries Face
Perry Stone Reveals Hidden Battles Ministries Face
A Vision of Hell: What This Woman Saw After Her Car Accident
A Vision of Hell: What This Woman Saw After Her Car Accident
What Set This Revelation Church Apart from the Others?
What Set This Revelation Church Apart from the Others?
10 Ways People Deceive Themselves About Their Faith
10 Ways People Deceive Themselves About Their Faith
previous arrow
next arrow
Shadow

Latest Videos
113K Subscribers
1.3K Videos
12.6M Views

Copy link